Mathematics of Operations Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Vol. 33, No. 4, November 2008, pp. 991-1001
DOI: 10.1287/moor.1080.0339
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zalinescu, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

On Zero Duality Gap and the Farkas Lemma for Conic Programming

Constantin Zalinescu

Faculty of Mathematics, University "Al.I.Cuza" Iasi, 700506–Iasi, Romania, and Institute of Mathematics, Octav Mayer, Iasi, Romania
zalinesc{at}uaic.ro

Recently S. A. Clark published an interesting duality result in linear conic programming dealing with a convex cone that is not closed in which the usual (algebraic) dual problem is replaced by a topological dual with the aim of having zero duality gap under certain usual hypotheses met in mathematical finance. We present some examples to show that an extra condition is needed to reach a conclusion; this supplementary condition is also provided. We also give counterexamples for three results on hedging prices and simple proofs for two known solvability results (see Propositions 4.1 and 4.2).

Key Words: conic programming; counterexample; duality gap; Farkas lemma; hedging prices
History: Received: May 21, 2007; revision received: April 14, 2008;





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.