|
|
||||||||
Department of Quantitative Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
This paper examines a tradeoff-consistency technique for testing and axiomatically founding decision models. The technique modifies earlier tradeoff-consistency techniques by only considering indifferences, not strict preferences. The resulting foundations are both more general and more accessible than earlier results, and they are so regarding both the technical and the intuitive axioms. Axiomatizations based on other, bisymmetry-like, conditions also follow as corollaries from the results of this paper. The tradeoff technique is applied to three popular theories of individual decision under uncertainty and risk, i.e., expected utility, Choquet expected utility, and prospect theory. The conditions used are better suited for empirical measurements of utility than earlier tradeoff conditions and, accordingly, are easier to test.
Department of Quantitative Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands
v.koebberling{at}ke.unimaas.nl
P.P.Wakker{at}UvA.nl
History: Received: January 4, 2002;
revision received: January 1, 2003;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bleichrodt, U. Schmidt, and H. Zank Additive Utility in Prospect Theory Management Science, May 1, 2009; 55(5): 863 - 873. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Abdellaoui, H. Bleichrodt, and C. Paraschiv Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement Management Science, October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1659 - 1674. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |