|
|
||||||||
School of Economic Studies, University of Manchester, England
Different attitudes towards gains and losses are a prominent feature of cumulative prospect theory for decision under uncertainty. In particular, decision weights for uncertain events can depend on whether the events involve gains or losses, and the shape of the utility function can reveal loss aversion. Decision analyses concentrate on event capacities, which determine decision weights, and on the shape of the utility function. The present paper focuses on linear/exponential, power-function and multilinear utility models for decision under uncertainty. We begin with straightforward preference axioms for a representation by a cumulative prospect theory functional. The axioms include weak ordering, continuity, monotonicity and tail independence. We show that in their presence constant absolute (proportional) risk aversion implies linear/exponential (power) utility. Then, for the multiat-tribute case, (mutual) utility independence leads to a utility function that is (additive/multiplicative) multilinear.
History: Received: August 24, 1998;
revision received: July 10, 2000;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bleichrodt, U. Schmidt, and H. Zank Additive Utility in Prospect Theory Management Science, May 1, 2009; 55(5): 863 - 873. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Schmidt and H. Zank Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory Management Science, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 208 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Wakker, S. J. T. Jansen, and A. M. Stiggelbout Anchor Levels as a New Tool for the Theory and Measurement of Multiattribute Utility Decision Analysis, December 1, 2004; 1(4): 217 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bleichrodt and J. Miyamoto A Characterization of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Under Cumulative Prospect Theory Mathematics of Operations Research, February 1, 2003; 28(1): 181 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |